We want our readers to trust what they find on Cottonwood Psychology. If we get something wrong, we fix it. This page explains what we correct, how we do it, and how you can tell us about an issue.
What we correct
We correct any mistake that could mislead a reader or reduce the quality of the article. That includes:
- Factual errors
- Outdated or misinterpreted research
- Broken links or incorrect citations
- Misquotes, missing context, or unclear wording that changes the meaning
- Typos and grammar problems that affect readability
How we make corrections
When a problem is flagged, we review the article, check the sources, and make the necessary fix.
- Minor edits. Typos, formatting issues, and small wording changes that do not affect the meaning may be corrected without a public note.
- Substantive corrections. If a change alters facts, conclusions, or key details, we add a short correction note at the end of the article. The note explains what was wrong and the date we fixed it.
- Broken or outdated sources. If a link or reference no longer supports a claim, we replace it with a reliable source or adjust the text to match the available evidence.
Updates vs. corrections
Psychology is an evolving field. Sometimes new studies refine what we know. In those cases we update articles to reflect the best available evidence. If the update meaningfully changes what a reader would take away, we add an “Updated” note at the end of the piece. If it simply adds clarity or examples without changing the takeaway, we update the text without a note.
How to request a correction
If you see a mistake, please email [email protected] with:
- A link to the page
- A brief explanation of the issue
- Any sources we should review
Clear, specific notes help us move quickly.
How quickly we respond
We review every correction request and address time-sensitive issues as soon as we can. If an error is serious, we prioritize it and fix it first.
Record of changes
For substantive fixes, we keep an internal record of what changed and when. When helpful to readers, we summarize the change in the correction or update note at the end of the article. Prior versions may be shared upon request when there is a strong editorial reason to do so.
Our standards
We aim to present research clearly and responsibly for a general audience. We avoid sensational claims, label opinion or interpretation, and link to sources where appropriate. If a study is preliminary or debated, we say so.
Questions
If you have questions about this policy or an article on our site, reach us at [email protected]. We appreciate your help keeping our work accurate and useful for everyone.